Edited 12 Jan 2011 and 26 July 2012
I have removed Mike Hoggard's latest video (on reflection) as I feel it is likely to give wrong impressions. From the feedback I got I have to agree that it is best not to publish it. I felt there was some very interesting news items within the video - especially the origins behind the 46 days of lent. I mean why is it 46 and not 40. The video explained it (please see my notes below, have made an amendment), but maybe not really relevant to the purpose of this blogsite. Thanks for the feedback
Edited Part
Please see my edited notes on the original articles:
I have removed Mike Hoggard's latest video (on reflection) as I feel it is likely to give wrong impressions. From the feedback I got I have to agree that it is best not to publish it. I felt there was some very interesting news items within the video - especially the origins behind the 46 days of lent. I mean why is it 46 and not 40. The video explained it (please see my notes below, have made an amendment), but maybe not really relevant to the purpose of this blogsite. Thanks for the feedback
Edited Part
Please see my edited notes on the original articles:
Posts
2 comments:
easter is the roman catholic name for the jewish feast of passover.Lent is a roman catholic idea and there is nothing in the jewish feasts before passover. why look for meanings in false religions?
Hi Anonymous,
The video explained why the Vatican introduced 46 days (rather than 40) days of lent. It is occultic and reeks of Babylon. It is another attempt of the Babylonic church (RC) to "christianise" their religion by counterfeiting what is of God with something else similar but completely corrupt.
Sorry, I guess I should have made that clearer that I was NOT supporting the idea of 46 days but trying to expose the heresy. I assumed (on the basis of everything else on my blog) that everyone would understand the direction I was coming from.
Thanks for pointing it out
Post a Comment